August 1, 2002


Carol Duggan
XXXX XXXXXX XXXX
XXX XXXXXX XX
XXXXXXXX, CT XXXX


Dear Carol:

Please accept this letter as official notice that we will be leaving Park Square West when our lease is up on August 31, 2002. While there have been things that I have enjoyed during my stay at Park Square West, that list has been out shined by the number of issues I have had with the building. I am including a list of those issues so it will be possible for you to take action against them in the future. These are the primary factors behind my decision not to renew my lease at Park Square West.


o Security
This is atrocious. The most secure area of the building is the recently opened tea garden. The security policies that are in place are still unclear to me. I was told that the concierge was to lock all exterior doors before making rounds in the building. That does not happen. On numerous occasions I have left the building and been gone for up to 30 minutes at a time without seeing the concierge or a locked door.

The policy of locking the doors after 11:00 p.m. is also troubling. I have been locked out of the building and been forced to stand outside while I waited for the concierge to return. On one occasion it took me a while to notice the concierge was smoking in the garage and could not hear me tapping on the window. I walked around so I could enter through garage and decided to try the side entrance. It was not locked and I proceeded to my apartment without being noticed. Systems should be in place to ensure residents have 24 hour access to the building.

What I find most frequently is that the concierge is standing outside smoking. Be it out on Summer Street, on Palace Way or in the garage, it is easy for anyone to walk in off the street and gain access to the building.

I can only assume that your policy on food deliveries is an attempt to address this type of issue. I find it as ineffective as it is inconvenient. Forcing me to pick up food from the lobby because you want to restrict access to non-residents (despite the loopholes noted above) is ridiculous. I suggest the following policy:

o Call the resident to confirm the order
o Send up the delivery person
o Make sure he/ she exits the building promptly
o Have the person sign in/out if necessary

This is just one possibility that may not consider all of the factors the policy attempts to address. Regardless, there has got to be a better way to deal with this problem.

The security in the parking garage has not fared any better. The gate has repeatedly been stuck in the up or down position. At times when this has happened on a weekend, I have seen the gate remain open until Monday. Both my girlfriend and I, on separate occasions, have had to manually open the gate on our own. It has been an upsetting inconvenience. The fact that there has already been a vehicle broken into in our garage makes it a legitimate concern.


o Facilities

Fire alarms have been a consistently present nuisance since I moved in almost a year ago. The two alarms we have had recently have been exceptionally aggravating since they both occurred after midnight. Until recently the most aggravating alarm had been the one we experienced in the afternoon on September 11th.

I have also had consistent problems with the toilet that is installed in our unit. Reuben has already been to our apartment to fix it once and it will need his attention again. Conversations with other tenants have made it clear that this is a widespread issue. It is not something I would expect in a brand new luxury apartment building.

The parking meters are less of an issue and more of an annoyance. There may be a reason why they cost three times more than any other parking meter I’ve seen in the city. You may even be able to explain why they are enforced until the early morning hours. Perhaps someone is trying to recoup losses from the months of free parking that was available to anyone who knew it was there. The discrepancy between other parking meters and the one’s in the garage is disconcerting.


o Responsiveness
There have been a few bright moments regarding the response to maintenance requests. Reuben’s visit to fix our toilet at 7:00 p.m. on a Friday was appreciated. Sadly, the response to such requests has not been very consistent. I had to make repeated requests for the following both in writing and in person:

- Email address – While I was assured that all the equipment was in place, this feature of our internet service took months to implement.

- Stain on the carpet – This was a remnant of the construction that had been there since the day we moved in. I asked Paul Rogan (the older gentleman who was overseeing operation when we moved in) if he could send someone up to take a look at it. It was not until a number of written requests were made before Reuben showed up to fix it. He determined that the stain was from glue that was spilled on the carpet.

- Entry – I had to make a number of requests that someone call first before entering the apartment. This request was ignored on more than one occasion. You once startled my girlfriend when you knocked and then quickly entered the apartment before my girlfriend was able to get up off the couch.

- Latch for the door – We noticed that other tenants had latches installed on their doors for an added level of security. I had made a number of similar requests in writing and in person due to the security issues I listed above. It was never installed.

- Communications – Serious situations that had a direct impact on the place where I lived were never discussed. Management chose not to address the actual fire that we had on the fourth floor, or the police raid that occurred on the second. The fact that these VERY serious events were never openly acknowledged leads me to wonder what has happened that I don’t know about yet.


o Deception
When I was making the decision on where I would be moving to, I was relying on the information I received from the leasing agents at a number of different buildings. Andreena and Dale gave me misleading and inaccurate information that would have affected my decision to move to Park Square West.

- Satellite television – On Internet sites and in the literature I had seen, the apartments were advertised as being cable ready. When I went to sign my lease I was told that I could "choose" to sign up for satellite. Expecting the benefits of satellite I signed up. I was not aware that I would not have access to Pay-Per-View, the interactive program guide, Dolby Digital broadcasts, broadcasts in HDTV or that I would have to sign up for additional features and rent a box to get any of them. When I tried to arrange for cable service, I learned that satellite was my only choice, and an inferior one at that. Knowing that would have affected my decision to sign a lease. Looking at the description on Apartments.com I noticed that the site says the apartments are wired for digital cable, which is a gross inaccuracy. Digital cable, to my knowledge, is not even available in Stamford. The only digital programming available in Stamford is satellite.

- Resident directory – We were told that guests would be able to contact us using the resident directory in the lobby. Months later, I found out that there were never any plans to activate them or keep them current.

- Access card – As far as I can tell there was no intention of offering this feature either. Seeing that an access card is already being used for the rooftop garden, I feel it is still something worth considering. It could help alleviate some of the security issues I mentioned and may even make it acceptable to get food deliveries again.

- Viewing security cameras – Andreena mentioned that, with the satellite service, we would be able to view the building’s security cameras on one of the channels. When I asked why this feature had not been implemented yet, I was told me there were no plans to offer such a thing.

- Putting green – The only putting green I have seen is the sporting goods special that was in the lobby for a while. Now even that has disappeared.

- Construction – The construction at the Palace Theater was a known issue and we considered it before we decided to sign our lease. What we did not consider is that construction would still be going on at Park Square West a year after we moved in. I believe I was told the estimated date of completion would be some time in October, 2001.


Park Square West is a beautiful building in a fine location, but despite all that I feel that I am not getting what I paid for. My stay there has been disappointing. I hope that you find these criticisms helpful and can use them to improve the quality of service you provide to your tenants.


Sincerely,








Jonathan Speights
Alba Ayala
Apartment #418


Cc: Wendell Yee